After more than a decade of cover-ups and stalling, the long awaited Public Inquiry into sexual abuse of youth in Cornwall and area has arrived. Hearings are set to begin in Cornwall on November 7, 2005.
Standard Freeholder reporter, Terri Saunders provided a well-written summary of the events leading up to the Inquiry in her November 5th story. In 1992, the Alexandria-Cornwall Roman Catholic Diocese paid an alleged victim an amount of $32,000 to remain silent regarding his claims of sexual abuse at the hands of a Catholic priest.
The article traces the developments in the criminal justice system, including police and the courts, to investigate over 100 charges and numerous defendants in the past decade.
In 1997, the Ontario Provincial Police claimed that no stone was left unturned in their investigation, and that there was no need to investigate further. Not one of the 100 charges resulted in a conviction. Apparently the justice system felt that there had been no wrongdoing, and that all of our children should feel safe in Cornwall.
However, over 10,000 area citizens who signed a petition for a public inquiry to investigate these charges in 2000 strongly disagreed with the Attorney General of Ontario in this regard.
Due to the efforts of many citizens in the region, including people like: John Cleary, Gary Guzzo, Jim Brownell, Paul Scott and Alain Seguin, a Public Inquiry was approved by the provincial government in November, 2004. All citizens looking for justice to be served in this community must have been relieved by this announcement.
It is interesting to examine the attitudes of individuals who will be called to appear in this Inquiry. Some of these individual were quoted in the above-mentioned Freeholder article.
Retired Bishop Eugene LaRocque’s comment shows that he is completely out of touch when he says: “ It’s a sad commentary that you have to prove you’re innocent in the world in which we live.”
Well, my question for the retired bishop would be: “Hello, what kind of world are you living in?” Here we have a man of the cloth, a man who has supposedly devoted his life to God, but who feels he is “above the law.” In other words, he should just tell us he’s innocent and shouldn’t have to defend himself against any accusers. It’s this kind of arrogance that LaRocque displayed throughout his tenure here in eastern Ontario.
Former Bishop LaRocque, you do not have to prove anything. Follow your Catholic doctrine and simply tell the truth. Tell the Inquiry why you paid out $32,000 to an alleged victim of sexual assault for starters, and tell the Inquiry if you had any knowledge of any priests in your diocese who sexually abused children.
Judge Chilcott is way off base when he said in 2002 that it is because of the “media coverage” that the sexual abuse scandal has led to an Inquiry. This is much too simplistic an answer. Let me remind the Judge that the media tired quickly of the former Project Truth after the year 2000, with many, including prominent citizens of Cornwall, refusing even to discuss it.

Mayor Phil Poirier was not interested in discussing an Inquiry, nor did he or Cornwall City Council publicly support it until it became a reality in November 2004. As you might expect Poirier was fully on board when Michael Bryant, Attorney General called a Press Conference to announce the Inquiry in Cornwall in April 2004. Former MP Bob Kilger did nothing publicly to support a Public Inquiry between 2000-2004 so I assume he was not in favour.
The truth is that former MPP John Cleary and current MPP Jim Brownell are, to my knowledge, the only local politicians that took a stand and called for a Public Inquiry consistently and courageously.
The truth of the matter is that it was only because of the above named citizens and others, who refused to let the issue die, and kept the pressure on Queen’s Park, that the sexual abuse allegations claims were resurrected. It was only then that the media climbed on board, anticipating many sensational stories and the selling of many more newspapers to come.
As for Bishop Durocher’s comments, he sounds more objective than others, but as he states, it is a priority to defend the Catholic Church, “to the fullest.” I hope that “truth and honesty” fit in there somewhere in this defence. When Durocher talks about the “full extent of our abilities” we must remind ourselves that the most powerful institution in the world, the Vatican, represents a lot of the “ability” to which Durocher refers. The Vatican will be watching events in Cornwall, Ontario quite closely during the coming months. No doubt about that.
For some background on the Vatican’s position regarding sexual abuse charges in dioceses throughout the world, please refer to another article on this website. (Posted on April 22, 2005)
Sadly, as I have noticed in previous comments by the clergy, there is little regard or even mention of the lives of the long-suffering victims. Sometimes it is as if the victims don’t exist. It’s unconscionable but true.
Have the Catholic Church and our other institutions been telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth about children under their authority?
A Public Inquiry will ask that question next week.